The Homo-Voodoo of Psychiatry and Psychology

Please see my post: Psychiatry and Psychology: End of an Illusion of which this post is a continuation. Let's make something unambiguously and unequivocally clear: The majority of biologists, the authorities on the science of life, are quite certain that homophilia, that is, same-sex attraction (androphilia: male-to-male and gynophilia: female-to-female and ambiphilia: both sexes) is a biologically normal variant among many populations and species, documented in over 1,400 species to exist.

By "biologically normal variant," we mean that it is a part of the human animal that a percentage of males and females are erotically aroused by their same sex, and while that percentage is variable, the incidence of it is not. Nor is exclusive homophilia the "dominant biological orientation," which for a sexual species must be heterophilia in order for the species to reproduce into the next generation. While homophilia does not contribute to the "survival of the species" through sexual selection, it is still conceivable, although unverified, that homophilia contributes to the good of the species in which it is found, and therefore may have an evolutionary basis, despite its recessive nature.

In addition to homophilia being "biological normal variant," it may also be normative for those who are constituted homophiles by nature. The word "normative" means a standard by which one accepts and lives according to one's good and the good of the species. Except for religion, which proscribes homophilia for its parochial and narrow interests, the moral and ethical dimensions of homophilia are no different for homophiles than for heterophiles, with the possible exception of paternity and responsibility in raising children of one's own or abandoned by others. Since homophiles do not reproduce, all the normative standards of heterophilia -- save childbearing and sibling nurture -- apply to homophiles.

Like all of humankind, homophiles join heterophiles in acknowledging and promoting the individual and social good by obedience to the Universal Moral Maxim: Do No Harm or Injury. Unfortunately, not all heterophiles subscribe to this universal, objective, deontological, and proscriptive morality, but instead try to harm and injure those who are homophile as if they are exempted from the same moral standards of the rest of humanity. They do their harms and injuries in several ways:

• use offensive language and harassment of homophiles to express their opprobrium of a normal biological variation, because
• their religious traditions (Judeo-Christo-Islamic) divine commands disapprove
• their instruction as psychiatrists and psychologists, both without scientific evidence-based foundations, claim a standard variant of the norm is "pathological" and "curable."
• the sexual freedoms of homophiles within the Universal Moral Maxim grants an increase in potential encounters without the "burden" of childbearing and childraising
• those irresponsible and selfish homophiles that disregard the Universal Moral Maxim are worse than heterophiles who do the same, because their humanity is defective
• homobigotry, like racism, sexism, ethnic varation, allows one to assert superiority and inferiority to natural variables of the species
• homobigotry is hugely profitable, especially if your cult claims the variation is a "pathology," and your cult offers "cures" for the otherwise healthy
• some people need to feel superior by insisting others unlike them in some immaterial way makes them "sub-human," like Zionists did to Palestinians, and Aryans did to Jews
• some self-loathing and closeted homophiles, afraid of others irrational homobigotry, will participate in homoloathing in order to assimilate
• without race, Jews, and Communists, homophiles are an ideal group to persecute and merit your eternal salvation by dividing the goats from the sheep
• some individuals find all manner of human sexuality "disgusting," especially those aspects involving genitals, asses, lips, and nipples
• some people mistake paraphilias for homophilia, which are separate and distinct, and those who are paraphiles are often a risk to other individuals, society, and themselves (but note, paraphilia is just as common among heterophiles as among homophiles)
• some males are sexually aroused by gynophiles, but find androphiles arousing too, but then the opprobrium setting one apart begins to fall between the cracks

This list is by no means exhaustive, but it is representative. What is important for most people, who are not naturally irrational, is that homophilia is (1) biologicially normal variant of human and other species' sexual condition; (2) homophilia is no different from heterophilia in its necessary obedience to the Universal Moral Maxim: Do No Harm or Injury, despite individuals who may violate the moral law; (3) it is both normal and normative for individuals to act in accordance with the biological constitution, and it is abnormal and abberrant to insist humans must act against their natural constitution; (4) homobigotry for fun, profits, and denigration violates No. 2; (5) homophilia can be immensely pleasurable and enjoyable, without the excluded feeling a need to stigmatize the natural, which only has adverse effects on everyone; (6) any profession, religion, or cult that claims non-evidenced-based metaphysics and untested cures as its grounding for inflicting harm and pain violates the Geneva Conventions, even if one is Jewish, Christian, or Muslim, or simply a metal defect.

IMPLICATIONS

I rehearse the obvious to most people because two entities won't give up their cash-cow of persecution: (1) organized religion of Jews, Christians, and Muslims; (2) the occult of mental metaphysics, a.ka., psychology and psychiatry, because both reject evidence-based biology and the applied-sciences based on biological facts. I do want to underscore that biologists are not alone in their ascription of homophilia as a natural variant of human sexuality, philosophers have long been proponents of homoerotic love and homopassion between the same sexes. Both disciplines, of course, are not prone to mythologies, metaphysics, and the occult. Dr. James Dobson, all associated with NARTH, Dr. Berman [infra.], and all homobigots in the psychoanalytic fields are doctorates in psychology and psychiatry.

But, as we cross the "great pond" into Great Britain, and journey up the Thames, we discover a worldwide pow-wow of psychiatrists and psychologists are conveening to "cure" their pariah, "homosexuality." Held by the Anglican Mainstream Organisation, the event will have "a special focus on how religious professionals and friends/relatives can respond biblically and pastorally to those struggling with unwanted SSA (same-sex attraction)." Yes, you read right. The Anglican Mainstream Organization is this year's homobigot host. Perhaps the Right Reverend will join Joseph Nicolosi PhD, of the National Association for the Research and Therapy of Homosexuality, James Dobson of Family in Focus, Genesis, and Exodus, upon the "success" of research published in the BMC Psychiatry journal showed that a sixth of registered British therapist and psychiatrists have attempted to "cure" patients of homosexuality. No biologist thinks a "pathology" exists; so how can one claim a "cure" to healthy?

Don't think the British psychiatrists and psychologists are behind Americans! Heaven's no. I recently reviewed Louis Berman, Ph.D., and professor of psychology, whose 550+ page tome on the subject of homophilia concludes, "the recovery from homosexuality is something like the recovery from alcholism" (p. 506).[1] Prof. Berman had to "self-publish" his magesterial tome on cures of homosexuals, apparently from publishers squeamish about anyone still so ignorant as Berman. In Berman's favor, as opposed to the Roman Catholic Nicolosi, "the principle that 'every homosexual is a latent heterosexual'" is just plain wrong. Instead, every homosexual is a latent alcoholic, and the "cutting edge of reorientation therapy are those therapists who are working with boys with 'gender identity disorders' to prevent adult homosexuality" (ibid). Reparative therapy fails, but sexual reorientation therapy succeeds, claims the retired psychologist.

Yes, behind every androphile is a transexual. All gay men want to be surgically reassigned as females, according to Dr. Berman, and to prevent "GID," the cutting-edge of reorientation therapy (the "new" Jewish approach from reparative therapy) is to "prevent adult homosexuality." You read right: "to prevent adult homosexuality," which is nothing more than gender-identity disorder (p. 506), and an easy recovery, just like recovery from alcoholism. Homophilia is basically like alcoholism, except it is men who want to be women, and once you "cure" the former pleasures of homophilia -- like that of a former drunk -- "you'll cultivate a different circle of friends," who drink beer as men and want sex with women, play baseball instead of being in drag. "Having put drinking [homophilia] behind him, he now feels that his everyday life is richer, he is more in touch with himself and with the world. He also feels that he is enjoying a more wholesome lifestyle" (ibid).

This is the kind of quackery the continues to infest "modern" psychiatry and psychology. Here a professor from the University of Illinois (retired), has taught his students that homophilia is "GID," and "something like alcoholism:" take away the Cosmopolitans, give him a chance to play "butch," and your homophile will not seek gender reassignment. You think I'm making this up? This is from a major psychologist, retired from teaching, upset his "pioneering" book on "homosexuality" could not find a publisher, so he resorted to "self publish." This is also the pseudo-science professor of "low masculinized brain" syndrome, a.k.a., homosexual small brains. Yes, homophiles have a "low masculinized brain," which is why they want gender reassignment, but psychoanalysts need to intervene "just like recovery from alcoholism," before the taste the forbidden fruit of other men, and viola, psychology cured into your ordinary healthy, natural Levitical Jew.

Gays, women, Jews, Christians, humanitarians, should read this bullshit. A "study led by Michael King of University College London, surveyed 1,400 medical professionals but finds that there is very little evidence that therapy can really help change whether a person is lesbian, gay or bisexual." Evidence? Evidence? Well, our Dr. Berman is convinced the evidence is simply like "alcoholism." Of course, as a psychologist, even with a Ph.D., he was never required to study human anatomy and physiology, only the "mind," and the abnormal and aberrant disorders of homosexuality and the "cures." Believe it or not, "just four per cent of therapists and psychiatrists said that they would try to use such treatments if asked by a patient today," to cure homosexuality. In Britain! But in the U.S., plenty of gender-reassignment prevention homosexual cures by psychologists are available --just like recovery from alcoholism, in 12 Easy Steps through your mental health professional.

Scientists say one thing. Psychoanalysts say another. One is evidence-based. The Other is hocus-pocus. And what do you say about the majority of Jewish, Christian, and Islamic psychiatrists and psychologists practicing "voodoo" on their patients? Worse, they collect payments from our taxes to promote this nonsense. The question is not ontological, whether mental health professionals are needed, but rather epistemological, whether those who dress in scientific "drag" are really scientists, or just closet cases of "wannabe?"

References:

Louis A. Berman, Ph.D., The Puzzle: Exploring the Evolutionary Puzzle of Male Homosexuality. Self-published by Godot Press, 2003.